Home / Full timeline / Civil Rights groups file suit against the U.S.’s undercounted census figures, stating that it threatens equal protection laws and federal funding. The Supreme Court strikes down the suit in favor of the census figures.
Civil Rights groups file suit against the U.S.’s undercounted census figures, stating that it threatens equal protection laws and federal funding. The Supreme Court strikes down the suit in favor of the census figures.
1996 (Mar 20)
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the 1990 census figures could stand, despite that between 1.6 percent and 2 percent of the population had not been counted. Minority groups had sought an adjustment to the figures because the erroneous numbers represented 4.8 percent of the Black population and 5.2 percent of the Hispanic population. The coalition of plaintiffs included such groups as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the national League of Cities, from such cities as Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, and New York. After then-Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher refused to revise census figures in 1991, the groups filed suit, arguing that the miscount was an affront to minorities' constitutional right to equal protection, because census figures determined congressional seating and federal funding for social programs. Before the Supreme Court's ruling, Mosbacher's decision had been upheld in 1993 by a district court, then overturned in 1994 by a circuit court of appeals. Supreme Court chief justice William Rehnquist opined that Mosbacher's argument, which stated that determining congressional districts resulted more from a "distributive accuracy" and not a precise numerical count of the population, was reasonable.
References:
- • Hornsby, Alton. Chronology of African-American History: Significant Events and People from 1619 to the Present. Detroit: Gale Research, 1995.