Home / Full timeline / James Earl Ray’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea and face a new trial for the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is denied.
James Earl Ray’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea and face a new trial for the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is denied.
1975 (Feb 28)
United States District Court Judge Robert M. McRae, Jr., in Memphis, Tennessee, denied James Earl Ray's motion to withdraw his guilty plea and face a new trial on the charge that he murdered Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1968. McRae said Ray's original plea of guilty was “cooly and deliberately” submitted and that he found no violation of Ray's constitutional rights that would warrant a reversal of the plea and a full trial in state court. McRae rejected Ray's contention that he came to believe he had no choice but to plead guilty because of his former attorney's actions and rejected Ray's allegations that famed criminal lawyer Percy Foreman of Houston, Texas, and attorney Arthur Hanes, Sr., of Birmingham, Alabama, failed to take adequate steps to prepare a defense because they were more interested in promoting their royalties on the Ray story under contracts with Alabama author William Bradford Huie. McRae ruled groundless Ray's argument that Foreman, specifically, coerced him into the guilty plea. The judge said there was no impermissible pressure from the attorney. “On the contrary, the matter was discussed on numerous separate occasions over almost one month, at the least." Ray “carefully considered and partially amended the lengthy stipulation of facts that formed the basis for accepting his guilty plea ... and entered the plea in an open court where he spoke to correct the record as he thought appropriate,” according to Judge McRae. Robert I. Livingston, one of Ray's new attorneys, announced an immediate appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.