Home / Full timeline / Federal judges rule that Florida’s Black-majority Third District was unconstitutional because it used race as the major factor in determining the district’s boundaries.
Federal judges rule that Florida’s Black-majority Third District was unconstitutional because it used race as the major factor in determining the district’s boundaries.
1996 (Apr 17)
Federal judges ruled that Florida's Black-majority Third District was unconstitutional because it used race as the major factor in determining the district's boundaries. Three judges ordered the state legislature to redraw the district's boundaries by May 22. The plaintiffs in the case argued that the horse-shoe shaped district, which covered 250 miles and 14 counties, had been created primarily to intensify the representation of Blacks. The majority opinion held that the defendants had failed to show that the district had been "narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest" and, therefore, violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The judges included an admonition that the ruling "should not be interpreted as 'turning back the clock' on the gains made by Black voters and other racial and ethnic voting minorities." Representative Corrine Brown opposed the decision and stated that the Third District, located in northern Florida, was "the most integrated and diverse district" in the state.
References:
- • Hornsby, Alton. Chronology of African-American History: Significant Events and People from 1619 to the Present. Detroit: Gale Research, 1995.