Home / Full timeline / The Supreme Court denies Jackson Giles for a second time in Giles v. Teasley, after Giles tries to sue voting registrars. The Supreme Court refuses to hear the case, stating that it had no lower court decision concerning the constitutionality of Alabama’s laws to review.
The Supreme Court denies Jackson Giles for a second time in Giles v. Teasley, after Giles tries to sue voting registrars. The Supreme Court refuses to hear the case, stating that it had no lower court decision concerning the constitutionality of Alabama’s laws to review.
1904 (Jan 15)
In Giles v. Teasley, the U.S. Supreme Court turned Jackson W. Giles away for the second time. A year earlier, the Supreme Court had refused Giles's request for an order for Alabama to register him as a voter. With that, Giles tried to sue voting registrars in Alabama state courts, still contending that the state's voting requirements violated the fifteenth amendment. When the state court dismissed his case, Giles took it to the Alabama supreme court, which refused to make a decision on the constitutionality of the state's laws. The Alabama court also double denied Giles relief by ruling that if the state's voting requirements violated the national constitution, then the registrars were invalid as registrars and could not register anyone at all. But if the state constitution was not in violation of the national one, then the registrars had acted within their authority and within the law, the court ruled. When this tangled decision was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court, it ruled, in 1904, that it could not hear the case because it had no lower court decision concerning the constitutionality of Alabama's laws to review.
References:
- • Hornsby, Alton. Chronology of African-American History: Significant Events and People from 1619 to the Present. Detroit: Gale Research, 1995.