Home / Full timeline / The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the disenfranchisement of indigents in its ruling of Breedlove v. Suttles by upholding the constitutionality of poll taxes.
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the disenfranchisement of indigents in its ruling of Breedlove v. Suttles by upholding the constitutionality of poll taxes.
1937
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the disenfranchisement of indigents in its ruling of Breedlove v. Suttles by upholding the constitutionality of poll taxes. The case was heard after Georgia's poll tax was challenged on grounds that it offended the rule of equality because it required a yearly payment of one dollar to vote, but only from people between twenty-one and sixty years old. The Southern Conference for Human Welfare also opposed the tax, calling it "patently a device for disenfranchising Negroes." The high court, however, supported the lower courts' decision that the poll tax did not violate any protection or privilege guaranteed by the Fourteenth, Fifteenth, or Nineteenth Amendment.
References:
- • Hornsby, Alton. Chronology of African-American History: Significant Events and People from 1619 to the Present. Detroit: Gale Research, 1995.